Filed under: Health, Movies, TV and Books, Fitness

I take it all back, Beijing was a
great choice to host this year's Olympics. Preparations for the Summer Games don't usually produce much newsworthy material --
heck, sometimes the entire event goes over with a big yawn. In stark contrast, the buildup to this year's games has been a hotbed of stories that draw our attention to the environmental degradation that Beijing is
working to hide.
With only 10 days left to prepare and almost all of the options already exercised, Beijing's air quality is still so bad that it looks like many Olympians will be wearing
anti-pollution masks. While I doubt that highlighting the state of China's environment was the goal behind awarding Beijing the Olympics in 2001, the choice has definitely put all sorts of
political and
environmental concerns at the center of the world stage.
One of the most fascinating things about Beijing's situation is the fact that most of us probably believed that the government would be able to clean it up by now. Sure, I write about the
irreversible doom and gloom of climate change almost everyday, but even I assumed that Beijing would be able to reverse centuries of degradation in a couple of months.
Now, just 10 days from the opening ceremony, it seems that all the air pollution measures might not be enough. How far is Greyjing willing to go in order to avoid embarrassment for the next couple of weeks? Will the government actually
shut down even more industry for the remainder of the Olympics?
Here's a rundown on
what they've already done to curb the smog: shut down polluting factories all over the region, taking 3.3 million cars off the road with license plate restrictions, and halted almost all construction. According to the
China Daily:
"More vehicles could go off the roads and all construction sites and some more factories in Beijing and its neighboring areas could be closed temporarily if the capital's air quality deteriorates during the Olympic Games,"
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
